
Studying Time: 3 minutes
Kristin Cavallari is revealing — or confirming — her most up-to-date man.
The The Hills alum has used her podcast to expose DMs and to espouse unhinged conspiracy theories.
It’s really a blended bag.
This time, she’s confirming what social media “detectives” had already labored out. However solely now that it’s over.


Kristin Cavallari was relationship Nate Thompson
Three months in the past, Kristin Cavallari teased that she was a “f–king WAG by means of and thru.”
WAG or WAGs refers to “wives and girlfriends” {of professional} or in any other case high-profile athletes.
On the time. she didn’t identify the thriller man. However it seems that his identify is Nate Thompson, who’s a former skilled hockey participant.
On her Tuesday, April 1 Let’s Be Trustworthy podcast episode, Cavallari confirmed that the NHL participant was her boyfriend.
She lamented that “TikTok f–king detectives” had “pieced collectively” clues from her Dumb Blonde interview in December 2024.
“I don’t even care,” she claimed. “I stated his identify on [my podcast] tour. I actually assume he’s such a terrific man. … He’s somebody who has performed lots of work on himself.”
They’re not collectively
Cavallari shared that she and Thompson had been “largely lengthy distance” throughout their erstwhile entanglement.
She listed that they saved the spark alive with “voice notes, FaceTime calls, cellphone calls, [and] texting.”
That stated, she admitted that she’s “performed” relationship any athlete who’s nonetheless taking part in.
However that doesn’t imply that she doesn’t have some very fond reminiscences from this current fling.


Talking on Tuesday, Cavallari shared that she and Thompson had “related on such a deep stage.”
In reality, she stated that it was “one of many deeper relationships” regardless of the comparatively “brief” period.
“We didn’t maintain again something,” she assessed of the reference to Thompson, which she known as “sincere, pure, superb.” Cavallari added: “We informed one another f–king all the pieces.”


This entanglement was lacking one thing …
She didn’t specify the rationale for the breakup. She did, nevertheless, trace at it.
“That attraction piece for me needs to be so on fireplace for me to need to be with somebody,” Cavallari expressed.
“I’ve gone out with superb males, and this man is an efficient instance of that,” she continued. “Why can’t I fall in love you?”
Cavallari summarized: “I would like compatibility and chemistry. I perceive that what I’m trying to find is uncommon.” Even so, she is “not gonna accept something lower than precisely what I need.”