Donald Trump’s declare that Nato troops stayed “just a little off the entrance strains” through the battle in Afghanistan is “disappointing”, a minister has mentioned.
Well being and Social Care Minister Stephen Kinnock mentioned the UK and different allies had “all the time stood shoulder to shoulder with america” and contributed to US-led missions.
On Thursday, Labour MP Emily Thornberry known as it an “absolute insult” to the 457 British service personnel killed within the battle, whereas Liberal Democrat chief Sir Ed Davey mentioned: “How dare he query their sacrifice?”
The UK was amongst a number of allies to hitch the US in Afghanistan from 2001, after it invoked Nato’s collective safety clause following the 9/11 terror assaults.
Chatting with BBC Breakfast, Kinnock paid tribute to the British troops killed in Afghanistan and described Britain’s armed forces as “the definition of patriotism, braveness, dedication, [and] professionalism”.
“They put their lives on the road to defend our nation. I’m disillusioned by President Trump’s feedback,” he added.
Kinnock instructed Sky Information Trump’s feedback had been “deeply disappointing”, including: “Anyone who seeks to criticise what they’ve accomplished and the sacrifices that they make is plainly unsuitable”.
Conservative MP Ben Overweight-Jecty, who served in Afghanistan, mentioned it was “unhappy to see our nation’s sacrifice, and that of our Nato companions, held so cheaply”.
The US president instructed Fox Information on Thursday that he was “unsure” the navy alliance could be there for America “if we ever wanted them”.
“We have by no means wanted them,” he mentioned, including: “We’ve got by no means actually requested something of them.”
“They will say they despatched some troops to Afghanistan,” he mentioned, “they usually did, they stayed just a little again, just a little off the entrance strains”.
He mentioned the US had “been excellent to Europe and to many different nations”, including: “It needs to be a two-way road.”
Getty PhotosThornberry instructed the BBC’s Query Time that the remarks had been “way more than a mistake”.
“It is an absolute insult… How dare he say we weren’t on the entrance line, how dare he?
“We’ve got all the time been there every time the Individuals have wished us,” she mentioned, calling Trump “a person who has by no means seen any motion” however was now “commander in chief and is aware of nothing about how it’s that America has been defended”.
She mentioned the US was the UK’s “good friend” however its chief had “behaved in a method that’s bullying, impolite, that has intentionally been attempting to undermine us, which has been attempting to undermine Nato.”
On the identical programme, Conservative shadow cupboard member Stuart Andrew additionally known as the feedback “disgraceful” and “appalling”.
“There are lots of individuals on this nation who served each in Iraq and Afghanistan, a lot of whom misplaced their lives, but additionally many extra who got here again with life-changing accidents and we should always say thanks to them.”
He added that the UK-US particular relationship was essential for each defence and safety, and that in current weeks Trump had directed dialog to the safety of the Arctic – the place he mentioned there was a “very severe menace”.
PA MediaSir Ed wrote on social media that Trump had “prevented navy service”, including: “How dare he query their sacrifice?”
Chatting with BBC’s Newsnight programme, Dutch overseas minister David van Weel rejected Trump’s remarks as “false”, saying “Europeans shed blood” in help of US troops in Afghanistan.
He mentioned Nato Secretary Basic Mark Rutte had rebuffed comparable feedback Trump made earlier, throughout a joint press convention the pair held at Davos on Thursday.
Requested in regards to the US president repeating the declare, van Weel, mentioned: “We must always communicate out for the reality as Mark Rutte did. And if he repeated it, we have to repeat it once more as a result of that is not how historical past went.”
In the meantime, former British Military officer Overweight-Jecty mentioned it was “unhappy to see our nation’s sacrifice, and that of our Nato companions, held so cheaply by the president of america”.
“I noticed first hand the sacrifices made by British troopers,” he wrote on X.
“I do not imagine US navy personnel share the view of President Trump; his phrases do them a disservice as our closest navy allies.”
Calvin Bailey, a Labour MP and former RAF officer who served alongside US particular operations items in Afghanistan, mentioned the president’s declare bore “no resemblance to the fact skilled by these of us who served there”.
“As I reminded the US Forces I served with on 4 July 2008, we had been there due to a shared perception, articulated at America’s founding, that free individuals have inalienable rights and mustn’t reside beneath tyranny,” he instructed the PA information company.
“That perception underpinned the response to 9/11, and it’s price reflecting on now.”
The BBC approached the Ministry of Defence for remark.
A spokesperson pointed to feedback made by Defence Secretary John Healey whereas visiting Nato ally Denmark on Wednesday – earlier than Trump’s feedback.
He mentioned: “In Afghanistan, our forces skilled collectively, they fought collectively, and on some events, they died collectively, making the last word sacrifice.”
The US invaded in October 2001 to oust the Taliban, whom they mentioned had been harbouring Osama Bin Laden and different al-Qaeda figures linked to the 9/11 assaults. Nato nations contributed troops and navy gear to the US-led battle.
Greater than 3,500 coalition troopers had died as of 2021, when the US withdrew from the nation – about two-thirds of them Individuals.
The UK suffered the second-highest variety of navy deaths within the battle behind the US, which noticed 2,461 fatalities.
The US is the one nation to have invoked the collective safety provisions of Nato’s Article 5, which states that “an armed assault in opposition to one Nato member shall be thought-about an assault in opposition to all of them”.
