America isn’t at peace. As I argued in Half I, the USA is already in a steady, long-term battle with decided adversaries who’re waging warfare with out crossing the edge into open battle. Infinite Warfare is a framework for understanding how these adversaries pursue a permanent method to erode and supplant U.S. energy, affect, and international management over time.
Infinite Warfare isn’t merely one other label for the grey zone or cognitive warfare. Each are vital components and benefit their very own approaches, however Infinite Warfare describes the adversary’s persistent, long-term technique, not simply the weather that allow it.
Given this working atmosphere, that is about excess of terminology. It’s about how we perceive battle, how we obtain deterrence, how we defend determination autonomy, how we retain leverage, and, most significantly, how we disrupt the networks that gasoline Infinite Warfare.
What are the important subsequent steps?
Infinite Warfare Requires a Totally different Strategic Mindset
Militaries are sometimes criticized for planning to struggle the final battle. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was undermined by Russia’s underestimation of how a lot warfare had advanced since Georgia in 2008 and Crimea in 2014. America probably faces that very same threat at present. It is crucial that we’re ready to struggle and win the following typical battle, however there are dangers in a deal with solely that technique. We should additionally put together to struggle and win—with the suitable devices of nationwide energy—the Infinite Warfare being waged on the USA by its adversaries; warfare that comes with grey zone exercise, cognitive warfare, weaponized negotiations, proxies and surrogates, and different subversive networks.
This modification in strategic mindset isn’t due to a scarcity of functionality. America has appreciable expertise, assets, and capabilities on this house. Infinite Warfare is conceptually completely different from typical battle—significantly given the ambiguous nature of gray-zone exercise and cognitive warfare—and subsequently calls for a unique method.
But as a result of it’s a steady state of battle, it additionally requires the identical stage of nationwide management and imaginative and prescient, group, vital considering, sense of urgency, and collaboration with allies that we apply to traditional battle. That is achievable however will take some effort. It could require a senior White Home official, resembling a Deputy Nationwide Safety Advisor for Strategic Competitors, to combine interagency motion and coordinate a sustained nationwide response to this risk.
That Deputy Nationwide Safety Advisor wouldn’t exchange current duties of Departments and Businesses. The function can be to make sure that strategic deterrence within the grey zone, cognitive benefit, battle negotiations when adversaries search to increase quite than resolve battle, and community disruptions are built-in right into a coherent and sustained nationwide response to the specter of Infinite Warfare towards the USA.
Strategic Deterrence within the Grey Zone
Strategic deterrence is one part of a broader method to countering Infinite Warfare. Grey zone exercise is a strong enabler of Infinite Warfare as a result of it provides our adversaries an area to undermine the USA whereas avoiding armed battle.
Our adversaries have calculated that there are extra positive factors than dangers within the grey zone and that any dangers they do face are acceptable. Actions that search to counter or defend towards grey zone exercise however that don’t impose significant prices or create credible deterrence might merely reward grey zone exercise.
An efficient technique for attaining strategic deterrence within the grey zone rests on deliberate preparation, clear communication, a nationwide method, and the resolve to vary the chance calculus of our adversaries.
Deliberate preparation means gathering and analyzing data on adversary grey zone traits, capabilities, and intent earlier than they act; routinely coordinating on the nationwide stage so roles, duties, and determination paths are clear; and reorienting establishments and the interagency to keep up efficient balanced functionality in each typical and grey domains.
We additionally should talk clearly domestically, to our allies, and significantly to our adversaries. A easy however clear message for our adversaries: “We’ll see what you’re doing, we are going to publicly attribute it to you, and we are going to impose prices that exceed your positive factors.”
This message is credible solely whether it is backed by motion over time. America should convincingly show its resolve to proactively and persistently make use of nationwide capabilities to vary the chance calculus and conduct of our adversaries.
This vary of nationwide capabilities contains coordinated diplomatic and allied motion, financial sanctions and restrictions, cyber operations, authorized and monetary disruption, public attribution, denying entry to vital applied sciences, cognitive measures, army posture and companion capability-building and—when crucial—kinetic responses. Current examples illustrate that imposing prices is feasible.
In 2021, the USA publicly attributed the SolarWinds supply-chain compromise to Russia, expelled Russian Intelligence Officers, and imposed broad monetary penalties below the Worldwide Emergency Financial Powers Act.
In early 2025, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned Sichuan Juxinhe Community Know-how Firm and related people for his or her function in Salt Storm for assaults on community infrastructure of a number of main U.S. telecommunication and web service suppliers.
These have been hard-earned wins for U.S. Departments and Businesses concerned, however Russia and China seem to have absorbed the prices and continued their operations. Reaching strategic deterrence implies that actions like these should change into the norm, not the exception.
The purpose of strategic deterrence within the grey zone is to form adversary decision-making earlier than motion is taken. It means proactively shaping the atmosphere so adversaries hesitate earlier than they act—a vital step in disrupting the cycle of Infinite Warfare.
Gaining a Cognitive Benefit
Countering the impacts of cognitive warfare is crucial to countering Infinite Warfare. My colleague, Austin Department, and I argued in The Cipher Temporary that it was doable—and crucial—for the U.S. to grab a Twenty first-century cognitive benefit.
That argument is much more pressing at present given the central function of cognitive warfare in our adversaries’ methods of Infinite Warfare. Cognitive Safety, at its core, is the safety of human cognition and determination autonomy—our particular person and collective means to precisely understand international occasions, to belief the information we have now and the data we obtain, and to make assured, impartial choices free from exterior manipulation, affect, or coercion.
Cognitive Safety can be about offense—outthinking, outpacing, and outmaneuvering our adversaries within the cognitive area.
Our adversaries ought to perceive that their leaders, establishments, networks, proxies—and decision-making—are susceptible to cognitive stress and affect. The purpose is to pressure them—not the USA—to confront the uncertainties and dangers of cognitive warfare and to weaken their means to wage Infinite Warfare.
There are some optimistic steps on the nationwide stage.
We now have a first-ever NSC Cognitive Benefit Director, and the FY26 NDAA directs the Secretary of Protection to formally outline cognitive warfare for the Division. The Division’s Strategic Capabilities Workplace not too long ago launched a Cognitive Warfare Venture to advance the army’s cognitive warfare capabilities. There may be clearly alternative right here.
But, these early steps stay fragmented. In distinction, China’s United Entrance Work Division, Russia’s Energetic Measures networks, and Iran’s numerous community of surrogates replicate centralized nationwide route and a long-term horizon as components of a nationwide technique.
On this important course of, America’s method must be equally well-coordinated and strategic. It’s important that these new efforts keep away from bureaucratic hurdles, over-prescription that will stifle innovation, and creating silos. Our adversaries won’t await us to catch up.
Our nationwide narrative—America’s Story—additionally performs an vital function. As Department and I argued within the Cipher Temporary, our nationwide narrative is each sword and protect. It tasks energy, affect, and advances our pursuits. It tells the story of our values, historical past, aspirations, and look at of the world. It helps confidence in our actions, our establishments, and our international commitments.
Importantly, America’s Story counters adversary narratives and actions that search to undermine America at residence and overseas. It could possibly function a strong antidote to adversary campaigns that use cognitive warfare to maintain extended battle. America’s Story was constructed at a time when a lot of the world noticed America as liberator, peacemaker, builder, international diplomat, and above all, a strong image of sacrifice, freedom, and self-determination. The lengthy arc of America’s Story is its energy.
America can not let this nationwide narrative get misplaced in episodic political turbulence—its function in countering our adversaries is simply too important.
Countering Weaponized Negotiations
Within the period of Infinite Warfare, adversaries usually use negotiations as a continuation of battle by different means—not as devices of decision. Negotiations can play an outsized function in Infinite Warfare though they solely happen periodically. The central problem is distinguishing when talks intention to legitimately resolve a battle versus when they’re designed to form its subsequent section.
Immediately, drawing classes immediately from Russia’s conduct—from Georgia to Ukraine—and from Iran, a number of ideas emerge that may strengthen our negotiating posture when going through adversaries that apply weaponized negotiations.
These key ideas embody:
No upfront concessions. Make no upfront concessions to get an adversary to the negotiating desk. Such actions erode diplomatic, financial, and army leverage and may form the whole negotiations on unfavorable phrases.
Set up clear overarching targets and non-negotiable redlines early. This preserves determination autonomy, offers a framework for decision-making, and prevents adversaries from reshaping targets to their benefit.
Proactively counter narratives. Throughout negotiations over Ukraine, Russia repeatedly pushed narratives, resembling “Ukraine can by no means win” and “territory concessions are inevitable,” to form Western perceptions of what constituted a sensible final result. Anticipating and countering false narratives ensures negotiations are usually not manipulated.
Concessions have to be conditions-based. Any concessions given throughout negotiations have to be based mostly on measurable, verifiable actions with automated snap-back mechanisms if commitments are violated.
Be prepared to stroll away. The need for any settlement ought to by no means outweigh core nationwide safety pursuits. Suspending or ending talks is best than enabling or accepting a settlement that resets the battle in an adversary’s favor.
Chester Karrass put it plainly, in life you don’t get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate. It is a highly effective counter to American assumptions that uncooked energy or battlefield success will carry the day on the negotiating desk.
Countering Infinite Warfare Networks
These measures—deterrence, cognitive benefit, and managing weaponized negotiations—significantly enhance America’s posture, however they don’t by themselves disrupt Infinite Warfare networks.
The final word purpose is systematically confronting the adversary networks that pose a permanent risk to the U.S. These networks fall into two broad classes: state institutional buildings and extra ambiguous buildings that blur the road between state and non-state exercise.
Institutional networks embody army organizations, intelligence providers, celebration organizations, proxy buildings, and state-directed organizations resembling IRGC-QF, MSS, GRU, and FSB, in addition to the specialised models accountable for assassinations and sabotage, affect operations, and cyber-attacks as just a few examples.
Ambiguous networks embody ghost fleets, shell and entrance firms, legal organizations, illicit monetary methods, logistics methods affect networks, cyber hacktivists, proxy militias, smuggling organizations, and different comparable entities.
These networks are usually not summary. Iran, Russia, and China make use of completely different approaches to Infinite Warfare, however every illustrates how adversaries develop and make use of each institutional and ambiguous networks to attain persistent strategic targets over a protracted timeframe. Simply as just a few examples:
Iran’s community of proxies and surrogates, constructed over many years, permits Iran to challenge energy, coerce and intimidate its neighbors, and get inside the choice house of its adversaries at comparatively low price. The IRGC is an enabler of Iran’s distributed networks with international attain.
Russia’s networks conduct cognitive warfare towards the U.S. and the West and conduct sabotage, assassinations, and political coercion throughout Europe. Russia’s “ghost fleets” have allowed it to generate billions in income regardless of Western sanctions.
China’s Cyber networks probe and penetrate U.S. vital infrastructure to maintain entry, acquire data, and supply a disruption functionality throughout a disaster. Its networks allow subtle affect operations contained in the U.S. and the switch of vital applied sciences that immediately improve its army capabilities.
Shared and overlapping networks in grey and ambiguous areas play a vital function. Ghost fleets, entrance firms, terror networks, illicit monetary organizations, and legal enterprises enable adversaries to bypass sanctions, maintain operations, and scale back worldwide stress.
A few of these networks are seen and attributable, others are deliberately obscured and decentralized to complicate attribution and defy sovereignty, worldwide regulation, and nationwide legal guidelines, together with these of the U.S. We must always count on our adversaries to fiercely defend these resilient, adaptive, and self-recovering networks they’ve rigorously developed over time, usually over many years, to realize and maintain a strategic benefit.
The vital query is how the U.S. can systematically scale back the effectiveness of those networks.
To paraphrase H.L. Mencken, for each advanced drawback there’s a solution that’s clear, easy, and flawed. That’s the dilemma going through the U.S. now. Overly simplistic approaches or single options that don’t take note of the complexities of Infinite Warfare and the dedication of our adversaries to that method will devour time and assets however in the end fail.
Countering Infinite Warfare requires a sustained, network-centric technique using the devices of nationwide energy—diplomatic, army, financial, technological, informational, cognitive, and kinetic—quite than a sequence of impartial actions. This technique consists of three mutually reinforcing traces of effort constructed on one foundational precept.
First, determine and prioritize the networks that pose the best long-term risk to the USA. There aren’t any official estimates of this ecosystem of networks—and what constitutes a community has not been clearly outlined—however Iran, Russia, and China, collectively direct or allow a really massive quantity institutional, industrial, legal, cyber, intelligence, affect, and proxy networks worldwide.
Second, maintain campaigns to sunlight, degrade, disrupt, and impose prices on institutional networks that conduct and oversee assaults on the USA and our allies. It’s unlikely that the U.S. can dismantle international institutional networks, however these networks might be degraded, constrained, and made pricey and fewer efficient.
Third, dismantle, disrupt, and forestall the regeneration of ambiguous networks by severing the monetary, logistical, technological, and organizational methods that assist them. This isn’t a one-time exercise. Ambiguous networks are extra susceptible, however they’re usually adaptive and may regenerate or get replaced.
Cognitive Safety and Cyber Defenses have a mixed important function to play. None of those efforts will succeed except Americans, enterprise leaders, army commanders, and coverage makers are much less susceptible to affect, manipulation, and coercion—preserving America’s determination autonomy—and except governments, establishments, organizations, and significant infrastructure are much less susceptible to technological exploitation and disruption.
Abstract
The ideas on this paper are troublesome to neatly categorize as a result of they describe a type of warfare that isn’t totally outlined. As typical warfare evolves, so do the extra nuanced points of warfare that happen beneath and above the edge of battle and within the ambiguous house between peace and battle. I provide 4 takeaways.
First, Infinite Warfare is a definite adversary technique already underway by China, Russia, and Iran and needs to be handled as a present strategic risk—not only a future one.
Second, infinite Warfare is sustained by subtle and interconnected networks that should change into a main goal for U.S. and allied efforts.
Third, countering Infinite Warfare requires a proactive, persistent, and network-centric method backed by national-level management, a brand new framework for strategic planning, a way of urgency, and coordinated interagency motion. Is ittime to think about a senior White Home official, resembling a Deputy Nationwide Safety Advisor for Strategic Competitors, to combine interagency motion and coordinate a sustained nationwide response to this risk?
Fourth, strategic deterrence within the grey zone, cognitive benefit, disciplined negotiations, and network-focused disruption are core instruments of that sustained nationwide response to make Infinite Warfare more and more ineffective, pricey, and in the end unsustainable for China, Russia, and Iran.
Infinite Warfare won’t finish as a result of our adversaries select peace. It can finish when it’s not efficient.
All statements of truth, opinion, or evaluation expressed are these of the creator and don’t replicate the official positions or views of the U.S. Authorities. Nothing within the contents needs to be construed as asserting or implying U.S. Authorities authentication of knowledge or endorsement of the creator’s views.
The Cipher Temporary is dedicated to publishing a spread of views on nationwide safety points submitted by deeply skilled nationwide safety professionals. Opinions expressed are these of the creator and don’t characterize the views or opinions of The Cipher Temporary.
Have a perspective to share based mostly in your expertise within the nationwide safety subject? Ship it to Editor@thecipherbrief.com for publication consideration.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Temporary
