Have Trump prosecutors made their case at hush-money trial?

His composure boosted the prosecutors’ case, and his testimony was bolstered by a weak cross-examination from Mr Trump’s authorized staff on day one, specialists mentioned.

Mr Trump’s lawyer, Todd Blanche, appeared disorganised at first, stumbling generally in his questioning, specialists advised the BBC.

However he appeared to make strides on the second day, Thursday, casting doubt on particulars of Cohen’s testimony, together with an October 2016 telephone name Cohen made to Mr Trump’s bodyguard wherein he claimed to must talked to Mr Trump about particulars of the hush-money cost.

It was a reminder of what specialists mentioned was considered one of prosecutors’ largest issues: Cohen’s credibility. The defence hammered residence the purpose that Cohen is a convicted prison, who frolicked in jail after being convicted on a number of costs together with mendacity to Congress.

Cohen was capable of testify to a key a part of prosecutors’ case – Mr Trump’s direct data of the hush-money cost reimbursement scheme.

Cohen mentioned former Trump Chief Monetary Officer Allen Weisselberg – at the moment serving a perjury sentence at Rikers Island jail – determined to categorise reimbursements from Mr Trump’s account as authorized bills. Cohen testified that he heard Weisselberg get the OK from Mr Trump himself.

As Cohen spoke, prosecutors additionally displayed the handfuls of cheques, ledgers and invoices on the coronary heart of the 34-count indictment.

However Cohen’s story could not sway all jurors.

“You might be counting on a witness who in lots of respects … comes with a bigger load of bags than others,” Ms Rendelman mentioned. “It makes it a bit harder to show the case past an affordable doubt.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *