NEW YORK — A supervising police officer who was current on the McDonald’s in Pennsylvania when police apprehended accused CEO killer Luigi Mangione was heard on physique digital camera footage saying Altoona police “most likely” wanted a warrant to proceed looking Mangione’s backpack.
The footage was performed throughout Day 4 of a pretrial listening to Monday through which Mangione’s protection attorneys try to exclude from trial vital proof that they are saying was illegally seized from his backpack and not using a warrant.
Altoona police arrested Mangione final December after being known as to a McDonald’s the place Mangione was consuming, 5 days after he allegedly gunned down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson on a Manhattan sidewalk.
Patrolman Christy Wasser had performed a cursory search of Mangion’s backpack, telling the superior officer on physique digital camera footage, “We simply wished to ensure there is not any bomb.”
Corporal Garrett Trent replied, “I perceive. At this level we most likely want a search warrant.”
One other officer is heard saying, “But it surely’s search incident to arrest,” the time period that authorizes Pennsylvania law enforcement officials to go looking people as soon as they’re taken into custody.
“Yeah, however we’re conscious of that crime,” Trent responded.
Altoona officers might have been conscious of the deadly capturing of Thompson, however at that time, Mangione solely had been arrested for forgery based mostly on the pretend driver’s license police stated he was carrying. The protection has argued the backpack search exceeded what might need in any other case been allowed.
“Is not it true that you simply have been truly looking his bag since you thought he was the New York Metropolis shooter?” protection lawyer Karen Friedman Agnifilo requested Wasser on the stand Monday. “No, we search everybody,” Wasser responded.
“You have been searching for proof he was the New York Metropolis shooter,” Agnifilo insisted.
The protection additionally seized on an announcement Wasser is heard making close to the tip of the search on the stationhouse: “Is not this superior.”
Wasser testified she stated it “as a result of I am pleased with our division.” Agnifilo jumped in, “Since you caught the NYC shooter?” Wasser responded, “Presumably.”
Agnifilo accused Wasser of pulling over on the way in which from the McDonald’s to the police station and looking the bag once more, nothing the drive took her 11 minutes — two minutes longer than it took different officers.
“That isn’t true,” Wasser stated.
When Mangione was formally positioned beneath arrest at 9:58 a.m., Wasser — a 19-year Altoona Police Division veteran — testified that she “walked over and picked up his backpack,” instantly pulling out a pocketknife and a loaf of bread.
Two minutes into the search, Wasser was seen on physique digital camera video extracting “moist, grey underwear” from the backpack. “And after I opened it up, it was {a magazine},” she testified.
Prosecutor Joel Seidemann requested it was “absolutely loaded,” and Wasser responded, “Sure.”
Wasser additionally stated she found a telephone in a Faraday bag, designed to hide its sign.
An officer was heard suggesting that the bag be dropped at the police station to verify for bombs. Wasser was heard joking that she most well-liked to verify it on the McDonald’s as a result of she “did not need to pull a Moser” — a sarcastic reference, she stated, to a former Altoona officer who introduced a bomb to the police station.
Protection attorneys have argued Wasser’s actions violated Mangione’s constitutional rights and will justify excluding any of the proof discovered within the bag, together with the alleged homicide weapon and writings that prosecutors say quantity to a confession.
The protection can be making an attempt to forged doubt on Wasser’s declare that she was trying to find a possible bomb, arguing in courtroom filings that the point out of a bomb was an “excuse designed to cowl up an unlawful warrantless search of the backpack.”
Throughout cross examination, protection lawyer Karen Friedman Agnifilo requested Wasser if she cleared the McDonald’s whereas trying to find a possible bomb, and Wasser replied, “No.”
Friedman Agnifilo requested, “Do you ask anybody to go away the realm you might be in?” and, “Do you stop something from coming into that aspect space of the McDonald’s to make use of the lavatory?” Wasser replied, “No” to each questions.
“Do you’re feeling across the bag and really feel one thing that looks like a bomb?” Friedman Agnifilo requested.
“Not at this level,” Wasser stated.
Friedman Agnifilo additionally tried to focus on that Wasser eagerly arrived on the McDonald’s after the officer who first responded to the decision advised her that he was busy.
“I advised you I used to be busy,” officer Joseph Detwiler was heard saying on physique digital camera footage. “However I began over anyway,” Wasser stated.
When their back-and-forth abruptly stopped, Wasser acknowledged that she “presumably” stopped speaking to Detwiler over considerations about being caught on his body-worn digital camera.
“You got here since you wished to be there,” Friedman Agnifilo stated. “No one else requested you to go.”
At 10:03 a.m. an officer was heard on the digital camera footage mentioning a search warrant. A distinct officer was heard saying that one was not wanted at that stage.
Though Wasser’s preliminary search of the backpack uncovered the journal, she missed the loaded handgun, silencer, and journal that have been buried deeper within the bag, she testified. Wasser testified that she solely found these objects when she performed an additional search after driving from the McDonald’s to the Altoona police station.
“There is a weapon!” she’s heard shouting on the video footage to the opposite officers within the consumption space, as Mangione was being searched simply toes away along with his ankles shackled.
“Is that the primary time you opened that zipper part on the aspect?” Seidemann requested Wasser on the witness stand.
“Sure, sir,” she affirmed.
With Mangione simply toes away from her within the station’s consumption space, she testified it might be “unwise” to proceed the search close to Mangione.
“Have been the defendant’s palms free on the time you took out the gun?” requested Seidemann.
“Sure,” she testified.
Physique digital camera footage confirmed Wasser and Deputy Chief Derek Swope take the weapon over to a close-by hallway — behind a locked door — the place she cleared the gun. She mumbled — at occasions inaudibly — when she defined the scenario to Swope on the video.
“We simply checked the bag … to ensure there have been no bombs or something,” she stated on the physique digital camera footage.
Because the search continued, Wasser shortly uncovered a silencer buried beneath different objects within the bag. She additionally discovered a journal allegedly belonging to Mangione.
“Holy s—,” Swope might be heard saying within the physique digital camera footage.
Wasser testified that she was cautious when checking the again as a result of the character of Mangione’s alleged crime “greatened [her] concern.”
“I simply wished to ensure there was nothing that would hurt anyone,” she testified.
“Did any of your supervisors say, ‘Cease — go get a search warrant?'” requested Seidermann.
“No,” she stated.
The stationhouse backpack search additionally turned up a slip of paper with a crude, handwritten map of Pittsburgh, Wasser testified, in addition to what Seidemann described as attainable escape routes.
The observe stated, “Maintain momentum, FBI slower in a single day” and “Break CAM continuity.” One other line learn, “3+ hrs off cam, exit diff technique (ex: megabus, rail)” and a observe saying “verify stories for present scenario.” The observe additionally stated, “bus to Penn station,” “change hat” and “both taxi … or cross river.”
Wasser was additionally heard on physique digital camera footage saying she pulled hair clippers from Mangione’s bag.
Earlier within the physique digital camera video — when she was nonetheless looking the bag on the McDonald’s whereas “The Twelve Days of Christmas” blared within the background — prosecutors highlighted an alternate between officers and a supervisor about whether or not a warrant was vital. One officer remarked {that a} warrant is perhaps wanted “due to the severity of the case,” however their supervisor interjected to say that no warrant was required as a result of the incident was a “search incident to arrest” — a warrantless search performed of an space throughout the arrestee’s rapid environment.
Prosecutor Nichole Smith of Pennsylvania’s Blair County District Lawyer’s workplace additionally testified, outlining the chain of custody of things seized from Mangione after he was apprehended.
Smith recalled a lieutenant from the Altoona Police Division calling her at 9:53 a.m. to advise her “that he had the person answerable for the CEO capturing” at McDonald’s. Smith stated she was in courtroom on the time and interrupted the continuing to tell her boss, Blair County District Lawyer Peter Weeks.
Smith stated she and Weeks suggested Altoona police to cost Mangione with forgery, carrying a firearm and not using a license, tampering with data for identification, possessing devices of against the law and offering false identification to regulation enforcement.
Smith described a search warrant that obtained a courtroom’s permission to grab Mangione’s belongings, together with objects in his backpack, and switch them to the NYPD.
“Sure objects in that bag weren’t inherently contraband, so we wished to make sure that the courtroom had authorized,” Smith testified. “Once they search the bag and so they uncover, as an illustration, the firearm, the ammunition and the suppressor, when he doesn’t have a sound allow to hold these objects hid, they grow to be contraband.”
Handwritten notes that police stated additionally they found in Mangione’s backpack weren’t related to the native fees in Pennsylvania. Ordinarily, they’d have been put apart and saved. The warrant allowed these objects to be transferred as attainable proof within the New York case.
Friedman Agnifilo objected to Seidemann referring to the writings as an alleged “manifesto” and Thompson’s killing as an “execution.” Decide Gregory Carro stated it was positive for the continuing suppression listening to however stated, “You are actually not going to do this at trial.”
The listening to was scheduled to renew on Tuesday for the fifth day of testimony.
Copyright © 2025 ABC Information Web Ventures.
