U.S.President Donald Trump arrives at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, in Michigan, U.S., January 13, 2026.
Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters
Eight NATO members’ items despatched to the U.S. will face escalating tariffs “till such time as a Deal is reached for the Full and Complete buy of Greenland,” President Donald Trump introduced Saturday.
The tariffs focusing on Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands and Finland will begin at 10% on Feb. 1, Trump wrote in a Fact Social submit.
The tariffs will shoot as much as 25% on June 1, the president stated.
The penalties would presumably stack on high of the present U.S. tariffs already levied on items from these international locations.
Tariffs imposed by the U.S. on its allies already common about 15% on items from the European Union international locations in Trump’s crosshairs and roughly 10% on imports from the UK, with charges various by sector.
In delicate areas akin to metals and sure autos, stacked measures have already pushed efficient tariffs into the mid-teens to mid-20% vary.
The imposition of tariffs on a number of members of the EU, which includes 27 nations, means the brand new tariffs would apply to all. Trump’s calls for now threaten the EU-U.S. commerce settlement struck in August.
Manfred Weber, a senior member of the European Parliament (MEP), stated the EU commerce take care of the U.S. is “not attainable at this stage.”
“The EPP is in favour of the EU-U.S. commerce deal, however given Donald Trump’s threats concerning Greenland, approval just isn’t attainable at this stage,” he wrote in a submit on X. “The 0% tariffs on U.S. merchandise have to be placed on maintain.”
Ambassadors from the EU will convene for an emergency assembly on Sunday, Reuters reported. Cyprus, which holds the six-month rotating EU presidency, referred to as the assembly, which is about to begin at 5 p.m. native time (11 a.m. ET).
Tariff technique
Trump’s submit advised that the new tariffs on European allies are being imposed in response to the international locations’ shifting troops to Greenland. They took that step because the Trump administration has floated using the U.S. navy as a part of its ramped-up efforts to accumulate the Danish territory.
The eight international locations “have journeyed to Greenland, for functions unknown,” Trump wrote. “It is a very harmful state of affairs for the Security, Safety, and Survival of our Planet.”
A day earlier, Trump hinted that he could pursue a tariff technique on Greenland just like the one he used to pressure overseas international locations to decrease drug costs.
“I could do this for Greenland too. I could put a tariff on international locations if they do not go together with Greenland, as a result of we want Greenland for nationwide safety,” he stated on the White Home on Friday.
Whereas the president didn’t cite particular authorized statutes in his Fact Social announcement for his newest strikes, it seems to reflect his controversial use of the Worldwide Emergency Financial Powers Act, a regulation that grants the president broad powers throughout an “uncommon and extraordinary risk.”
The Supreme Court docket may rule as quickly as subsequent week on whether or not to strike down the tariffs imposed underneath that regulation and will instantly imperil this new tranche, successfully daring the judiciary to intervene in a recent commerce conflict.
Scott Lincicome, a commerce coverage scholar on the Cato Institute, warned Saturday that the brand new risk exposes the fragility of counting on unilateral offers moderately than binding treaties.
“Trump’s tariff announcement confirms… that his commerce offers may be modified on a whim and are unlikely to constrain his each day tariff impulses,” Lincicome stated in an announcement. “At the moment’s risk underscores the empty justifications for Trump’s so-called ’emergency’ tariffs, which reveal the financial and geopolitical issues that unbounded govt energy creates.”
Army personnel believed to be from the German armed Forces Bundeswehr disembark a constitution airplane upon arrival at Nuuk worldwide airport on Jan. 16, 2026 in Nuuk, Greenland, the day after it arrived transporting Danish navy personnel.
Alessandro Rampazzo | AFP | Getty Pictures
European response
Throughout Europe, the focused nations responded with condemnation, characterizing the tariffs as a hostile act in opposition to shut navy allies that threatens the very material of the trans-Atlantic partnership.
European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen, who spearheads the bloc’s commerce coverage, issued a pointy rebuke to the White Home’s ultimatum, framing the tariffs not simply as a commerce dispute however as a take a look at of Western values.
“We select partnership and cooperation,” von der Leyen wrote in a submit on Bluesky shortly after the announcement. “We select our companies. We select our individuals.”
Likewise, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen informed MS Now Saturday that Trump’s transfer got here as a “shock,” citing a latest “constructive assembly” with U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Frederiksen pushed again on Trump’s claims concerning troop actions, stating the elevated presence is strictly to “improve safety” in an Arctic area that’s “not a low pressure space,” and was completed in “full transparency” with U.S. allies.
Different European leaders have been equally agency. European Council President Antonio Costa stated Saturday that the bloc is “coordinating a joint response” to the risk.
“The European Union will all the time be very agency in defending worldwide regulation, wherever it might be,” Costa stated at a press convention Saturday following the signing of a commerce settlement between the EU and South American nations in Paraguay.
French President Emmanuel Macron additionally weighed in, posting on X that “no intimidation nor risk will affect us.” Macron warned that “stabilizing forces have woke up” and vowed that France would stand agency alongside its neighbors.
Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson sternly rejected Trump’s tariff threats.
“We won’t enable ourselves to be blackmailed,” he wrote on X, including that “solely Denmark and Greenland resolve on points regarding Denmark and Greenland.”
EU’s overseas coverage chief Kaja Kallas warned that the brand new tariffs play proper into the palms of China and Russia.
“China and Russia have to be having a area day. They’re those who profit from divisions amongst allies,” she wrote in a submit on X. “If Greenland’s safety is in danger, we are able to handle this inside NATO.”
A protester takes half in an indication to point out assist for Greenland in Copenhagen, Denmark, on Jan. 17, 2026.
Tom Little | Reuters
NATO pressure and authorized battles
Trump’s newest transfer places additional pressure on NATO, the 32-member navy alliance established after World Struggle II. The cornerstone of the alliance is an settlement that an assault on any single member is taken into account an assault on all of them.
European leaders have warned that any try by the U.S. to take Greenland by pressure may spell the tip of NATO.
Trump’s tariff announcement may sign he’s dropping the specter of navy motion to attain his longtime aim of taking up the island. Nevertheless it however ratchets up stress on Denmark and the remainder of Europe, which have flatly said that Greenland just isn’t on the market.
Some cautioned European leaders to keep away from reacting rapidly to Trump’s tariff risk.
“Simply ignore it and wait and see,” Carsten Brzeski, world head of macro at ING Analysis, informed Reuters. “Europe has proven that it’s going to not settle for every part, and so the tariffs are literally already a step ahead in comparison with the threatened navy invasion.”
Lawmakers push for de-escalation
Because the White Home ramped up stress, a bipartisan U.S. congressional delegation in Copenhagen pushed again in opposition to Trump’s narrative.
“There aren’t any urgent safety threats to Greenland,” Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., informed reporters Saturday morning.
Coons and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, led the journey to “restore a way of belief” with Greenland, Coons stated.
The 2 senators disputed Trump’s characterization of European troop actions as a conspiracy to dam U.S. acquisition of the island, as a substitute praising the deployments as NATO companions “stepping up,” Coons stated, to safe the Excessive North in opposition to Russian aggression.
“Seeing energetic coaching and deployments into one of many harshest, most distant locations on Earth… we should always take as an encouraging sign,” Coons stated.
Murkowski emphasised that regardless of the president’s assaults, assist for Denmark stays robust throughout occasion traces.
“You can’t enable this to turn into a partisan matter,” she stated. “Help for our buddies and allies… shouldn’t be.”
Likewise, Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., each members of the Bipartisan Senate NATO Observer Group, warned that threatening tariffs on NATO would increase prices for U.S. households whereas benefiting adversaries like Russia and China.
In a joint assertion, the lawmakers stated: “Persevering with down this path is unhealthy for America, unhealthy for American companies and unhealthy for America’s allies… At a time when many People are already involved about the price of residing, these tariffs would increase costs for each households and companies.”
The lawmakers stated Danish and Greenlandic officers need to “associate with the USA,” urging the administration to “flip off the threats and activate diplomacy.”
— Terri Cullen contributed to this report.
That is breaking information. Please refresh for updates.