The United Nations marks its eightieth Anniversary this 12 months. NPR’s Scott Simon speaks with Nahal Toosi, senior international affairs correspondent at Politico, in regards to the group’s relevance at the moment.
SCOTT SIMON, HOST:
The United Nations marks its eightieth anniversary this 12 months. And in that point, it has attracted many critics, together with at this week’s U.N. Normal Meeting assembly, U.S. President Donald Trump.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: What’s the function of the United Nations? The U.N. has such super potential. I’ve at all times stated it. It has such super, super potential. However it’s not even coming near residing as much as that potential.
SIMON: And the query comes because the U.N. struggles to deal with the conflict in Ukraine, famine in Gaza and a sequence of funding cuts, amongst different international crises. Nahal Toosi is the senior international affairs correspondent at Politico, and he or she joins us now. Thanks a lot for being with us.
NAHAL TOOSI: It is nice to be with you. Thanks.
SIMON: You and I’ve each coated wars and tragedies all over the world. I feel particularly of my expertise in Bosnia, the place you could possibly see the U.N. on the bottom, and but, the battle nonetheless goes on. The effectiveness of the U.N. at stopping conflicts could be questioned, cannot it?
TOOSI: Completely. However it’s actually necessary to additionally to recollect, you recognize, the U.N. is like a corporation of organizations, proper? So it does have organizations inside it that take care of, like, humanitarian assist, migration, issues like that. And lots of them do good work. A few of them take care of very technical points, like telecommunications guidelines or no matter. However on the subject of the geopolitical stuff, the decision-making our bodies, just like the U.N. Safety Council, it is successfully a frozen palace. I imply, nothing can occur. The large powers are vetoing one another, and choices should not being made. It is like being in quicksand, basically.
SIMON: After all, america was essential within the very creation of the U.N. However the Trump administration has minimize lots of U.S. help to U.N. applications and plans to chop extra, together with, I collect, peacekeeping efforts, migration, public well being. Are a few of these applications endangered?
TOOSI: Completely. Sure. And there is two methods to have a look at this. One is you’ll be able to pull all of the funding and put a bunch of stress on the U.N. and say it’s a must to do extra with much less, or it’s a must to turn into extra environment friendly, or possibly a few of these issues simply need not occur anymore. And that would result in simply lots of dysfunction in lots of applications that really do assist individuals. Or you could possibly really say, look, we’re america. We’re the primary donor to the U.N., and we need to see modifications, and we need to push by way of reforms – good reforms – that do, maybe, contain merging some features, some funding cuts, mainly staffing cuts in lots of methods.
There are undoubtedly ways in which the United Nations could be extra environment friendly, however we need to be a part of the answer, not merely complain and pull out sources. And I do not know, to be sincere, if proper now the Trump administration is considering, let’s simply use the whip for some time, after which in a while, possibly we’ll are available in and act just like the saviors. However you do should do not forget that the United Nations – it is a discussion board. It is a venue. Its member states are what issues. And should you’re the main member state, and also you simply select to stroll away and complain as an alternative of attempt to sort things, then possibly you are a part of the issue.
SIMON: U.N. Safety Council would not exist with out the veto energy, however can it do something with the veto in place?
TOOSI: Look, that is the last word query. And one of many reforms that, you recognize, the Biden administration backed, as an illustration, was increasing the everlasting members of the Safety Council. And that included including two seats for African international locations who actually should not represented on the everlasting members of the Safety Council. However they did not need to lengthen the veto to those new everlasting members. They did need to preserve the veto, although, for the 5 present everlasting members who’ve the veto. So I simply do not even perceive the purpose, proper? I imply, the veto proper now has turn into an actual challenge to something getting achieved on the geopolitical entrance.
SIMON: After all, the U.N. exists within the shadow of the League of Nations, which america wound up not becoming a member of, even if President Wilson was certainly one of its architects. And clearly, the League of Nations was unable to forestall the beginning of World Battle II. What classes do you assume the U.N. ought to take in?
TOOSI: I feel that it’s a must to ask your self whether or not it’s attainable to have a physique just like the Safety Council, particularly, if the veto goes to freeze it. And it’s a must to ask whether or not a physique just like the Normal Meeting, which consists of all the members – 193 members, international locations, proper? – and whether or not these votes must be greater than symbolic, as they often are, whether or not these votes ought to really matter. Otherwise you form of should say, effectively, possibly we have to simply have a discussion board the place ad-hoc teams could be set as much as resolve various things, and the Safety Council shouldn’t be actually related.
I’m not a lot of an knowledgeable, I imply, actually, on what potential buildings there are, however I actually hope there are individuals smarter than me interested by this and asking what might be the subsequent iteration. As a result of if the U.N. fades into irrelevance, we nonetheless nonetheless – as a world group – should discover a technique to all discuss to at least one one other and make choices as a result of there are such a lot of challenges dealing with the world that cross borders, local weather change being certainly one of them.
SIMON: Nahal Toosi is a senior international affairs correspondent at Politico. Thanks a lot for being with us.
TOOSI: It has been nice. Thanks.
(SOUNDBITE OF KAKI KING’S “NEANDERTHAL”)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might fluctuate. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.
