Picture: Curtis Means-Pool/Getty Photos
Simply after midnight on Tuesday, Donald Trump let or not it’s recognized that he’s, as soon as once more, fairly indignant with reporter Maggie Haberman:
Whereas Trump didn’t say what, particularly, “Magot Hagerman” acquired flawed, it appears secure to imagine that he was responding to an article on Natalie Harp that makes it sound like his “devoted aide” is somewhat too devoted.
Earlier this yr, a number of shops reported that Harp was nicknamed “the human printer” on the Trump reelection marketing campaign as she was all the time by the candidate’s aspect, bringing fawning on-line protection into the bodily realm. The Bulwark defined in Might:
Harp, 32, occupies a novel function within the historical past of presidential campaigns: aide who travels with a transportable printer (plus paper and rechargeable batteries in a big bag) whose job is to feed Trump a gentle stream of knowledge on 8.5-by-11-inch items of paper. That method, the 77-year-old doesn’t should pressure his eyes on a smartphone to learn all of the information that’s match to print in MAGAville.
Harp’s path to affect started in 2019 when she appeared on Fox Information and credited then-president Trump with saving her life. She stated she had bone most cancers, and that Trump’s Proper to Attempt legislation gave her entry to experimental remedies. After the looks, she was employed as a One American Information Community anchor and later by the Trump 2024 marketing campaign.
Now, Haberman and co-author Jonathan Swan report that another Trump aides aren’t thrilled that Harp will quickly be “proper outdoors the Oval Workplace.” They’re apprehensive about her feeding the president conspiratorial on-line content material:
… Ms. Harp additionally established herself on the middle of a fast-moving carousel of textual content messages, articles, and tidbits directed at Mr. Trump. This has generated concern amongst different aides who really feel she has been far too prepared to function a funnel for conspiratorial data at a second when Mr. Trump seems extra contemptuous than ever of makes an attempt to handle or management him. Certainly one of her go-to information sources, individuals who have noticed her say, is the web site Gateway Pundit, which often disseminates conspiracy theories embraced by the far proper.
And so they appear to suppose Harp ought to have stopped typing when Trump’s dictated missives — like his 40-plus submit diatribe in opposition to E. Jean Carroll, and his indignant texts to billionaire donor Miriam Adelson — acquired him into bother. Right here’s some footage of their course of:
However the element from the New York Occasions story that’s getting probably the most consideration is the revelation that Harp despatched Trump a number of adoring letters:
In 2023, Ms. Harp despatched a collection of letters to Mr. Trump that unnerved folks round him, in line with a half-dozen folks with data of them.
“You might be all that issues to me,” she wrote in one of many letters, which had been seen by the New York Occasions. The letters’ authenticity was confirmed by two folks with direct data of them.
“I don’t ever wish to allow you to down,” Ms. Harp wrote, thanking Mr. Trump for being her “Guardian and Protector on this Life.”
In one other letter, she informed Mr. Trump that she needed to get again to “that synergy” she used to have with him, the place “we’d discuss every thing and nothing.”
“I wish to convey you pleasure,” she wrote, “to really feel like we will get by means of a day with out ever having to speak ‘work.’”
Is it flawed to inform your employer “you might be all that issues to me” and write letters expressing your deep want to convey them “pleasure”? Ought to Harp not have completed that? Is that form of factor frowned upon?
The Occasions appears to suppose so! However I’ve acquired to plead ignorance on this factor. I’ve labored in a number of workplaces and I let you know, folks try this on a regular basis!
